Search for: "Harry D. Simmons" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2010, 11:40 am by Eugene Volokh
Simmons-Harris decision, which in turn I think is quite right (though I’d probably take it even further). [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 126228 (ND IL, Aug. 9, 2017), an Illinois federal district court dismissed a Rastafarian inmate's complaint that his dreadlocks and beard were removed forcibly.In Simmons v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 4:50 am by Alfred Brophy
I posted on this back at the beginning of December, but I thought that I'd post another reminder now... [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
Díaz discusses his Border Contraband: A History of Smuggling across the Rio Grande [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, March 7, 2020 Tags: Accredited investors, Capital formation, Equity offerings, Private firms, Regulation D, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Solicitation Statement by Commissioner Peirce on Proposed Amendments for Facilitating Capital Formation and Expanding Investment Opportunities Posted by Hester M. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:46 pm
Simmons-Harris, the 2002 Cleveland school vouchers case, seemingly created a situation where governments would almost have to be trying to violate the Establishment Clause for a funding scheme not to pass muster. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 7:18 am by Bill Marler
Erin Parisi Simmons recalled with chagrin that she unsuspectingly brought I.M. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:39 am
I've read the intro to it, by Ian Simmons, and if he's the author of the whole thing, I salute him. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:06 am by Bill Marler
Erin Parisi Simmons recalled with chagrin that she unsuspectingly brought I.M. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:33 am by Sasha Volokh
Simmons-Harris because prisons would be participating on a neutral basis, independent of religion. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:11 am by AdamSmith1776
If you'd prefer it didn't, all I can say is: "Get over it. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
On April 30, 2009, the court entered an Order (“Pattern or Practice Order”) (docket no. 197) in which it assumed that either: “(1) § 706 permit[ted] the EEOC to pursue a pattern or practice claim ... or (2) the EEOC ha[d] constructively amended its complaint to assert a § 707 claim against CRST in this lawsuit in addition to its § 706 claim. [read post]